http://www.testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/13/the-code-coverage-metric-is-inversely-proportional-to-the-criticality-of-the-information-it-provides/ Treatises on the practice of software testing Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:49:32 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/13/the-code-coverage-metric-is-inversely-proportional-to-the-criticality-of-the-information-it-provides/comment-page-1/#comment-588 I.M. Testy › Code Coverage: More Than Just a Number Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:09:27 +0000 http://testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/13/the-code-coverage-metric-is-inversely-proportional-to-the-criticality-of-the-information-it-provides/#comment-588 [...] of code coverage implies something is well tested. Interestingly enough, 2 years ago I wrote a post illustrating how the metric can be gamed and how the code coverage measure tells us nothing about [...] [...] of code coverage implies something is well tested. Interestingly enough, 2 years ago I wrote a post illustrating how the metric can be gamed and how the code coverage measure tells us nothing about [...]

]]> http://www.testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/13/the-code-coverage-metric-is-inversely-proportional-to-the-criticality-of-the-information-it-provides/comment-page-1/#comment-316 I.M. Testy › Reconsidering Code Coverage Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:06:41 +0000 http://testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/13/the-code-coverage-metric-is-inversely-proportional-to-the-criticality-of-the-information-it-provides/#comment-316 [...] that testers should not believe high code coverage numbers mean “well tested.” (Again see my blog post from Aug 2007.) Unfortunately, the path to the point was fraught with inaccuracies and tangents that I almost [...] [...] that testers should not believe high code coverage numbers mean “well tested.” (Again see my blog post from Aug 2007.) Unfortunately, the path to the point was fraught with inaccuracies and tangents that I almost [...]

]]>