<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pesticide Paradox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/19/the-pesticide-paradox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/19/the-pesticide-paradox/</link>
	<description>Treatises on the practice of software testing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:49:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bj Rollison</title>
		<link>http://www.testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/19/the-pesticide-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Bj Rollison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/19/the-pesticide-paradox/#comment-571</guid>
		<description>Hi Inder, 

I agree with you to some extent and think teams should have a mix of personalities and backgrounds. However, in studies with simulations the types of bugs found seems to level out regardless of the diversity of the test practitioners. That was one of our findings in our case studies evaluating exploratory testing that you can read about &lt;a href=&quot;http://testingexperience.com/testingexperience04_09.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

I wouldn&#039;t say more effective, but I think you might agree that outsourcing has demonstrated itself to be a viable option for some companies. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Inder, </p>
<p>I agree with you to some extent and think teams should have a mix of personalities and backgrounds. However, in studies with simulations the types of bugs found seems to level out regardless of the diversity of the test practitioners. That was one of our findings in our case studies evaluating exploratory testing that you can read about <a href="http://testingexperience.com/testingexperience04_09.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say more effective, but I think you might agree that outsourcing has demonstrated itself to be a viable option for some companies. <img src='http://testingmentor.com/imtesty/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inder P Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/19/the-pesticide-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Inder P Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/19/the-pesticide-paradox/#comment-570</guid>
		<description>Not only the test approaches but also even the test practitioners have different sensitivities to different types of bugs. 

Further, some people seem to believe that independent V&amp;V is more effective than in-house testing.

Inder P Singh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only the test approaches but also even the test practitioners have different sensitivities to different types of bugs. </p>
<p>Further, some people seem to believe that independent V&amp;V is more effective than in-house testing.</p>
<p>Inder P Singh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I.M. Testy &#8250; Thinking About Critical Thinking And Test Design</title>
		<link>http://www.testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/19/the-pesticide-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>I.M. Testy &#8250; Thinking About Critical Thinking And Test Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/19/the-pesticide-paradox/#comment-559</guid>
		<description>[...] to testing is preferred over the other. It is not an either or proposition as I explained in my post on the pesticide paradox, and there are certainly more than 2 approaches to software testing. Testing requires multiple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to testing is preferred over the other. It is not an either or proposition as I explained in my post on the pesticide paradox, and there are certainly more than 2 approaches to software testing. Testing requires multiple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I.M. Testy &#8250; Evaluating Exploratory Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/19/the-pesticide-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>I.M. Testy &#8250; Evaluating Exploratory Testing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/19/the-pesticide-paradox/#comment-340</guid>
		<description>[...] categories of issues, and is less effective at exposing other types of problems. (See post on Pesticide Paradox.) And now we have researched case studies that begin to help us understand how to utilize [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] categories of issues, and is less effective at exposing other types of problems. (See post on Pesticide Paradox.) And now we have researched case studies that begin to help us understand how to utilize [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention I.M. Testy › The Pesticide Paradox -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/19/the-pesticide-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention I.M. Testy › The Pesticide Paradox -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testingmentor.com/imtesty/2009/11/19/the-pesticide-paradox/#comment-312</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Marisa Seal, Bj Rollison. Bj Rollison said: Yes, i m tweeting, moved blog to my site, and have new post discussing pesticide paradox http://bit.ly/2hemMf Hmm...what&#039;s next? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Marisa Seal, Bj Rollison. Bj Rollison said: Yes, i m tweeting, moved blog to my site, and have new post discussing pesticide paradox <a href="http://bit.ly/2hemMf" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2hemMf</a> Hmm&#8230;what&#39;s next? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
